Triathlon Week Logo
Home Forum Register Your images Calendar Reviews Bike Rack Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Triathlon Week > Triathlon Training Forums > Triathlon Newsfeeds > Heart Rate Monitor Questions and Recommendations



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread
Old 12-08-2004, 09:37 PM   #1
Ronnizia
 
Ronnizia's Avatar
 
My Photos: (0)
Heart Rate Monitor Questions and Recommendations

I have heard that the polar monitors are really good but I hate the way
they look. I think they are so ugly and the ones with any real
functionality are HUGE.

So I have researched and found the oregon scientific HR308:

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

and the Nike Imara:

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

I was pretty much talked out of the Imara by my local REI sales person
because he said they have been getting a lot of returns.

So I was wondering if anyone has any experience with either of these?
Also I am thinking about getting a polar m32 strap (because it is nice
and thin) and I am wondering if it will work with either of these?
Any feedback welcome. Thank you.

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2004, 09:46 PM   #2
Steve B.
 
Steve B.'s Avatar
 
My Photos: (0)
Re: Heart Rate Monitor Questions and Recommendations

Ronnizia said:

> I have heard that the polar monitors are really good but I hate the way
> they look. I think they are so ugly and the ones with any real
> functionality are HUGE.
>
> So I have researched and found the oregon scientific HR308:
>
> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
>
> and the Nike Imara:
>
> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
> 54.html
>
> I was pretty much talked out of the Imara by my local REI sales person
> because he said they have been getting a lot of returns.
>
> So I was wondering if anyone has any experience with either of these?
> Also I am thinking about getting a polar m32 strap (because it is nice
> and thin) and I am wondering if it will work with either of these?
> Any feedback welcome. Thank you.
>


The battery in my Oregon Scientific (basic model, don't remember the number)
sender went flat quickly (just a couple of months), then the display started
to play up (I suspect moisture inside). Then I had to replace the battery in
the receiver (watch), and now the one in the sender is getting weak again.
It hasn't been a good experience.

Steve = : ^ )

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2004, 06:22 PM   #3
Gooserider
 
Gooserider's Avatar
 
My Photos: (0)
Re: Heart Rate Monitor Questions and Recommendations


"Steve B." <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].au> wrote in message
news:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ].au.. .
> Ronnizia said:
>
> > I have heard that the polar monitors are really good but I hate the way
> > they look. I think they are so ugly and the ones with any real
> > functionality are HUGE.
> >
> > So I have researched and found the oregon scientific HR308:
> >
> > [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
> >
> > and the Nike Imara:
> >
> >

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
> > 54.html
> >
> > I was pretty much talked out of the Imara by my local REI sales person
> > because he said they have been getting a lot of returns.
> >
> > So I was wondering if anyone has any experience with either of these?
> > Also I am thinking about getting a polar m32 strap (because it is nice
> > and thin) and I am wondering if it will work with either of these?
> > Any feedback welcome. Thank you.
> >

>
> The battery in my Oregon Scientific (basic model, don't remember the

number)
> sender went flat quickly (just a couple of months), then the display

started
> to play up (I suspect moisture inside). Then I had to replace the battery

in
> the receiver (watch), and now the one in the sender is getting weak again.
> It hasn't been a good experience.
>
> Steve = : ^ )


I don't have a Nike HRM, but I have a Lance 4 watch. I have to say the
quality has been less than spectacular. I got it last Christmas, and within
a month the yellow Lance sig on the back stuck to my wrist. 6 months after
that the strap broke---and I had to pay to get it replaced. Then I contacted
Nike because of the signature problem and various nicks and dings in the
titanium case. To their credit, Nike sent me back what appears to be a brand
new watch. Still, this kind of quality and durability in a $279 watch leaves
much to be desired. To answer the OP's question---Polar. I have an old M52
which has been flawless for 10 years now, and Polar's customer service is
exemplary. The battery died so I sent it back. I paid the standard battery
replacement fee(12 dollars or so) and received the watch back with a new
transmitter AND a free T-shirt. They're awesome.


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2004, 08:44 PM   #4
Kirk Gaskell
 
Kirk Gaskell's Avatar
 
My Photos: (0)
Re: Heart Rate Monitor Questions and Recommendations

Stay away from the Nike at all costs. Having got one for my birthday in
April, I returned 4 in the span of 90 days before finally going with a
Polar.



"Ronnizia" <[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]> wrote in message
news:1102567053.279055.312330@f14g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
>I have heard that the polar monitors are really good but I hate the way
> they look. I think they are so ugly and the ones with any real
> functionality are HUGE.
>
> So I have researched and found the oregon scientific HR308:
>
> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
>
> and the Nike Imara:
>
> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
>
> I was pretty much talked out of the Imara by my local REI sales person
> because he said they have been getting a lot of returns.
>
> So I was wondering if anyone has any experience with either of these?
> Also I am thinking about getting a polar m32 strap (because it is nice
> and thin) and I am wondering if it will work with either of these?
> Any feedback welcome. Thank you.
>



  Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2004, 09:36 PM   #5
PJ
 
PJ's Avatar
 
My Photos: (0)
Re: Heart Rate Monitor Questions and Recommendations

Polar seems to be the standard. I'm on my third (M52, s610 and now the
s625x) and have been pleased with all of them (though the s610 leaked a
bit but kept working).

PJ
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]


Ronnizia wrote:
> I have heard that the polar monitors are really good but I hate the

way
> they look. I think they are so ugly and the ones with any real
> functionality are HUGE.
>
> So I have researched and found the oregon scientific HR308:
>
> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
>
> and the Nike Imara:
>
>

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
>
> I was pretty much talked out of the Imara by my local REI sales

person
> because he said they have been getting a lot of returns.
>
> So I was wondering if anyone has any experience with either of these?
> Also I am thinking about getting a polar m32 strap (because it is

nice
> and thin) and I am wondering if it will work with either of these?
> Any feedback welcome. Thank you.


  Reply With Quote
Reply

Add this thread to:  Submit to Clesto Clesto  Submit to Digg Digg  Submit to Reddit Reddit  Submit to Furl Furl  Submit to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Submit to Spurl Spurl Seed Newsvine  triathlon


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:00 AM. Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0 | Style Design by vBStyles.com
Another fresh idea from Experiential Marketing. © 2007, 2008 Robert Gourley

Bookmark and Share |  Subscribe



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
Page generated in 0.17117 seconds with 13 queries